Civilization Dynamics
TR

Markets

How many times accumulated wealth and expectations change hands within a year.
OverviewDetailed AnalysisMethodology

In-year market flows, sources, method, limits

Layer 2's Income Statement and Balance Sheet were a snapshot of a MOMENT (end of 2025) - how many assets the world holds, how much it owes. Layer 3 answers a different question: how much trading volume (flow/turnover) occurs in the world's financial markets DURING the year - FX, interest rate derivatives, equities, equity derivatives, crypto, commodities, credit derivatives, bonds, repo, hedge funds, insurance, real estate (commercial and residential), mortgages.

1The Question

The Balance Sheet/Income Statement work answered the question of "what does the world hold." Layer 3 answers the question of "how much trading turns over in world markets during the year" - a completely different order of magnitude (trillions of dollars daily), and completely different sources (not SNA/OECD, but market-statistics institutions like BIS/WFE/SIFMA/ISDA/Swiss Re).

2What It Is Built From

SourceCoverageFreshnessRole
BIS 14th Triennial Central Bank SurveyFX + Interest Rate Derivatives (OTC), 52 countries/1,100+ banksApril 2025Daily average turnover
BIS Quarterly Review (Dec. 2025) data fileFX + Interest Rate Derivatives (exchange-traded)April 2025Exchange volume complementing OTC
WFE Focus DashboardEquity trading volume, monthlyOct 2024 - Sep 202512-month total
SIFMA 2025 Capital Markets Fact BookGlobal long-term fixed-income issuance2025 (full year)Bond market flow
ISDA “CDS Market Dynamics” (DTCC data)Credit derivatives, 98% of world transactions2025 (full year)Credit derivative flow
OFR + ICMA + BOJ + PBoC/CAMLMACRepo, 4 major regions (US/Europe/Japan/China)2025-Q3/Dec/Jul/year-endDaily open position (different metric)
Swiss Re Institute “sigma” reportWorld total insurance premiums2024 (full year)Insurance flow
CoinGlass / BlockThesis24-hour volume of world crypto exchanges2025 annual averageCrypto flow (annualized with 365 days)
CME+ICE+LME+Euronext (volume) + CZCE (OFFICIAL turnover, direct)Commodities, 36 contracts/products: Energy + Metals + Agriculture + China (CZCE's 21 products)2025 (annual ADV/full-year volume/turnover)Project estimate - partial/lower-bound commodity flow
Savills Research (MSCI RCA data)Real estate, commercial investment, 16 countries (>90% of world)2025 (Q1-Q3 actual + Q4 estimated)Real estate investment flow
NSE + JPX + Cboe (all 12 US options exchanges)Equity derivatives (options premium turnover + futures turnover), 3 countriesIndia FY25, Japan 2025, US 2025 (11-day sample)Derivatives flow (partial)
US OFR official API (SEC Form PF aggregation)Hedge funds, Gross Notional Exposure/GAV/NAV, ONLY large US-registered funds2025-Q4 (Dec 31, 2025)Quarter-end open position (different metric)
China NBS official report + NAR (project estimate)Residential sales, ONLY China+US2025 (full year)Residential sales flow (partial)
ECB official SDMX API + UK Finance official reportNew mortgage lending, ONLY Eurozone+UK2025 (full year)Mortgage flow (partial)

3Method

  • Each source is taken in its OWN natural unit, not forced into a common mold. FX and Interest Rate Derivatives are published as a DAILY average in the BIS Triennial Survey - these are converted to an annual equivalent using a 250-business-day assumption (the standard financial-market calendar). Equities, Bonds, CDS, and Insurance are already published as ANNUAL flow at their own sources.
  • Repo was NOT annualized because it's a DIFFERENT type of metric from the others. The figure OFR provides isn't a "daily new transaction volume," but the average OUTSTANDING POSITION (exposure) for that day - since repo is mostly overnight, the stock and the daily new-transaction volume become intertwined. That's why Repo is shown separately and excluded from the total.
  • The OTC + exchange-traded split is preserved, then summed. For FX and Interest Rate Derivatives, BIS provides two separate sources (Triennial Survey = OTC, Quarterly Review = exchange-traded) - the two are summed to get the category total, and shown separately in the item breakdown.
  • Crypto is annualized with 365 days, not 250. Crypto exchanges trade nonstop 24/7 including weekends - so using 365 days gives a more accurate annual total.
  • Equity Derivatives are based on PREMIUM TURNOVER, not notional turnover. For options, "notional" (number of contracts × index value × multiplier) is a leveraged/theoretical figure that greatly overstates the money actually paid - the same problem as the misleading "$600T notional" headline figure for OTC derivatives. That's why NSE's (India) own reported PREMIUM TURNOVER was used; for futures there's already a single "turnover" concept (price × lot × contract).
  • Hedge Funds, like Repo, are shown separately as a quarter-end OPEN POSITION. OFR's Gross Notional Exposure (GNE) figure is the sum of the absolute values of long+short positions - a leveraged/gross exposure, not an actual cash flow. That's why it wasn't annualized or included in the total.

4What Came Out

CategoryDailyAnnual Equivalent
Interest Rate Derivatives$25,27T/day$6.317,8T
FX (Foreign Exchange)$9,72T/day$2.429,4T
Government Bond Trading Volume$1,37T/day$342,2T
Equity Trading Volume-$184,5T
Commodities (Energy+Metals+Agriculture+China, Partial)$0,63T/day$158,6T
Crypto Trading Volume-$96,5T (365 days)
Equity Derivatives (India+Japan+US, Partial)-$82,8T
CDS / Credit Derivatives-$41,8T
Bond Issuance-$29,9T
Card & Digital Payment Volume (Visa+Mastercard)-$27,6T
Insurance-$7,9T
Syndicated Loan Market-$7,0T
Mortgages (New Residential Lending, Partial)-$3,38T
Real Estate (Residential Sales, Partial)-$2,77T
Real Estate (Commercial Investment)-$0,95T
Private Equity Deal Volume (Partial)-$0,90T
Carbon Markets (EU ETS)-$0,90T
Art & Collectibles Market-$0,06T
Repo (World - US+Europe+Japan+China)$31,9T/day (open position, separate)-
Hedge Funds (US, GNE)$39,1T (quarter-end open position, separate)-
TOTAL (excluding Repo and Hedge Funds, 18 categories)$9.735,0T

5How It Was Tested

  • A pre-existing claim from the site itself was verified for the first time. The narrative text on the Layer 3 Overview page (formerly part of the Layer 2 Overview) had stated that "the total of transactions occurring in the world financial system is on the order of roughly 40 T USD daily" - a claim not tied to any source, likely a rough estimate. The FX+Interest Rate Derivatives daily total ($34,99T) came out at the SAME ORDER OF MAGNITUDE as that claim.
  • The CDS total reconciles to the penny with its own internal components. ISDA's report states Index CDS ($39,0T) + Single-Name CDS ($2,8T) = $41,8T - the summed sub-items also reach exactly this total.
  • Treating Repo differently on purpose is a deliberate methodology decision, not an error. In the first draft, Repo was also annualized ×250 like the others - but this created a double-counting risk by presenting the STOCK of short-term repo positions as if it were a FLOW.

6Where the limits are

The commodities figure is a PARTIAL lower bound, not the world total. WFE/FIA only provides contract COUNT; Chinese exchanges account for 79% of contract count but with very different contract sizes, so a naive conversion isn't reliable. Ready-made "USD total" claims also come from non-transparent commercial market-research firms - instead, a separate estimate was built using each exchange's own ADV data × standard contract/lot size × average price, across four groups: Energy (CME/ICE volume, EIA price), Metals (LME's own 2025 ADV for its 6 metals, World Bank Pink Sheet price), Agriculture (CME/CBOT's 4-contract ADV + Euronext/MATIF's own official 2025 full-year volume in Europe, World Bank Pink Sheet price), China (CZCE's own OFFICIAL year-end bulletin - no price calculation, the RMB turnover the exchange directly publishes was used, 21 products - cross-verified against independent Sina Finance reporting). COMEX Gold/Silver and SHFE/DCE (China's other 2 major exchanges besides CZCE) - attempted with multiple methods (direct request, headless browser) but all hit CAPTCHA/WAF blocks - still entirely excluded.

Repo now covers 4 major regions (US+Europe+Japan+China) but still isn't fully global - smaller/emerging markets like India and Korea are excluded; also, the 4 regions are reported as of different reference dates and were converted to USD using a single August-2026 exchange rate.

The real estate figure only covers commercial investment; residential sales are excluded. The Savills/MSCI RCA data covers 16 countries, but residential buy-sell volume - likely much larger - hasn't been measured at all here; the smallest item on the list may reflect a lack of data coverage more than an actually low turnover rate.

The Equity Derivatives figure covers ONLY India+Japan+US. NSE, the world's largest derivatives exchange by contract COUNT (WFE 2025: 88.9% of world stock index options volume is on NSE); JPX (Japan) with its own official "Trading Value" data; and the US (Cboe) with its own official "Net Option Premium" data (all 12 US options exchanges, but ONLY options - index futures like the CME S&P 500 e-mini haven't been added yet; since full-year API access wasn't available, 1 day from each month of 2025 was sampled and annualized) were included - but this isn't the world total. Excluding BSE (India's 2nd exchange), Eurex/CME/OCC don't publish premium turnover in USD (only contract count), and KRX (the Korea Exchange - KOSPI 200 Options is historically one of the world's most-traded derivatives) couldn't be accessed because its official data portal is JavaScript-based.

The Hedge Fund figure (GNE) covers ONLY the US and is an OPEN POSITION, not a flow. OFR's API only covers large "Qualifying Hedge Funds" that file Form PF with the SEC - small funds and funds registered outside the US (Cayman Islands, etc.) are excluded.

Real Estate (Residential Sales) covers ONLY China+US. China's figure is NBS's official data (clean); the US figure is a project-derived estimate (NAR doesn't publish a $ total - 4.06M sales × $414,400 median price, likely a LOWER-bound estimate). The UK, Japan, and Germany are excluded.

Mortgages (New Residential Lending) covers ONLY the Eurozone+UK. The US, the world's single largest mortgage market, was deliberately left out - a finalized 2025 figure from the MBA couldn't be found (PDFs returned 403 errors, and estimate revisions ranged inconsistently from $1.4T-$2.3T) - it was excluded rather than adding weak data. China also only publishes a NET (negative in 2025) change.

Annualizing FX and Interest Rate Derivatives is a ROUGH assumption. The BIS Triennial Survey measures the average of a SINGLE sample month (April) once every three years - the actual full-year total may deviate from this figure depending on seasonality.

7Historical series (Historical Development page)

This page builds a snapshot of 2025 (about 9,700 T$ a year). A separate Historical Development page (/layer3/tarihsel) tracks annual market flow / turnover from 1900 CE to today. Before 1900 this measure did not exist: organized securities and derivatives markets are largely a 19th-20th century phenomenon, so earlier points are empty (no concept). The 1900-2000 figures are rough estimates (low confidence) - to be updated when a better long-run series (BIS / WFE historical) is found. Today's figure is Layer 3's own total (§2-§6).

Derived series (same build, no new sourcing): annual turnover per person, the flow relative to annual world GDP, the flow relative to the same year's physical material output (thousand $/tonne - decoupling from physical production, from 1900), and a growth decomposition + rate. Population and GDP are shared with the Layer 1 historical series. Full method: docs/layer_history_methodology.md §6 in the project repository.

SeriesSourceNote
Annual market flow 1900-2000sourced educated guesslow confidence; will change when a BIS/WFE historical series is found
Annual market flow 2025Layer 3's own total (§2-§6)BIS · WFE · SIFMA · ISDA · Swiss Re · CoinGlass etc.
Population, world GDPLayer 1 historical seriesfor the per-capita and vs-GDP ratios
Physical material outputLayer 0 historical seriesfor the flow ÷ material decoupling ratio

8Perspective page, Leverage and Physical Contact

The Leverage and Physical Contact page (/layer3/detay/kaldirac-temas) in the "Perspective" group reads the 20 market categories from §2-§6 on two new axes: the degree of contact with physical Layer 0 (ownership transfer / liquid exchange / derivative / purely financial) and the typical leverage range. Volumes are aligned to layer3_market_flows.json; the two new axes are a separate compilation (layer3_leverage_contact.json).

Leverage & Contact, sources
ItemSourceMethod
OTC derivative notional / gross market valueBIS, OTC Derivatives Statistics, H1 2024for IRS, CDS: notional ÷ gross market value, a leverage proxy
Exchange initial-margin ratesCME Group · Eurex · ICE, published margin tables 2024-2025leverage ≈ 1 ÷ initial-margin rate (futures, options)
Equity / repo leverageUS FINRA Regulation T (equities) · SIFMA repo haircut conventionsReg-T 50% → 1-2×; treasury repo haircut 1-4%
FX leverageBIS, Triennial Central Bank Survey 2022 · prime-broker conventionsinstitutional 20-50× typical band
Leverage ranges are typical published bands

The "typical leverage" per instrument is not a single observation but a range derived from exchange margin tables and BIS/ISDA notional-to-gross ratios. Actual position leverage can fall outside the band depending on the trader, the collateral and the market state.

The physical-contact tier is a qualitative classification

The four contact tiers (ownership transfer / liquid exchange / derivative / purely financial) are an editorial taxonomy summarising an instrument's link to Layer 0; not a continuous "% contact" measure.

9Perspective page, Speed and Latency

The Speed and Latency page (/layer3/detay/hiz-ve-gecikme) added to the "Perspective" group reads the abstraction of value to the speed of light through three measures: the New York-Chicago latency hierarchy, HFT's share of volume per market, and the ratio of traded paper barrels of oil to physical production. A separate dataset outside the main pipeline (layer3_latency.json).

Speed and latency, sources
ItemSourceMethod / note
Latency hierarchy (human 250 ms → FPGA 1,000 ns)Laughlin, Aguirre & Grundfest 2014 (Financial Review 49:283-312); Deary, Der & Ford 2001 (Intelligence 29:389-399); Leber, Geib & Litz 2011 (FPL 2011:317-322); Lewis 2014, Flash BoysNY (Carteret/Mahwah) ↔ Chicago (Aurora) one way, great circle 1,178 km. Fibre latencies from Laughlin et al.'s measurement (April 2010); the FPGA row is a processing latency in-chip, not a transit (academic prototype, 1 µs).
HFT's share of volume, per market (50%)US SEC, Equity Market Structure Literature Review Part II (2014); Menkveld 2016 (Annu. Rev. Fin. Econ. 8:1-24); ESMA 2014; Joint Staff Report 2015; Chaboud et al. 2014 (J. Finance 69:2045-2084); Haynes & Roberts 2015 (CFTC)Per market, labelled with year and source. The mock's unsourced "74-82%" was not used; measurements cluster around 50% (range 33-67%).
Paper barrels / physical barrels ≈ 15Futures Industry Association, Annual Volume Survey 2023; US EIA, Short-Term Energy Outlook (2023 world crude + condensate)WTI (244 M) + Brent (219 M) futures contracts × 1,000 barrels = 463 bn paper barrels ÷ 29.9 bn physical. Two futures contracts only; adding options, micro contracts and OTC swaps raises the multiple to 25-40.
HFT share and the paper-barrel ratio move year to year

The HFT share of volume varies by identification method and by market (firm-based vs order-flag; equities vs futures vs FX). FIA contract volumes move each year; the robust claim is the order of magnitude (a double-digit multiple), not the exact 15. The great-circle distance is 1,140-1,190 km depending on which data-centre pair is taken.

Human reaction time is a distribution

250 ms is a representative median for simple visual reaction time (Deary et al. 2001, large sample 250-290 ms); it is not a single point. The citable academic figure for FPGA tick-to-trade is 1 µs; current commercial systems are faster, but no unsourced "hundreds of nanoseconds" claim is made.

10Perspective page, The Feedback Loop (cross-layer)

The Feedback Loop page (/layer3/detay/geri-besleme) compiles evidence for the coupling between Layer 3 and the physical base in both directions: top-down (L3 decisions → the real world) and bottom-up (physical shocks → the markets). A separate cross-layer dataset (layer_feedback_loop.json). For some channels the direction or size of the effect is contested in the peer-reviewed literature; those rows are given with both views.

Feedback channels, sources
ChannelMain sourceContested? / counter-source
↓ Commodity financialization → real food/energy pricesTang & Xiong 2012 (RFS 25:1533-1570); Cheng & Xiong 2014 (ARFE 6:419-441); UNCTAD TDR 2011CONTESTED, Irwin & Sanders 2011 (AEPP 33:1-31), 2012 (Energy Econ. 34:256-269); Fattouh, Kilian & Mahadeva 2013: no causal effect of index investment on the price level
↓ Systemic financial crisis → real output and employment lossLaeven & Valencia 2018 (IMF WP 18/206); Reinhart & Rogoff 2009Descriptive; across 151 systemic crises the median output loss is 30% of trend GDP
↓ Interest-rate / bond markets → real investmentuser-cost elasticity -0.5…-1; policy rate +1 pp → business investment -2…-5% within 2 yearsCONTESTED, Sharpe & Suarez 2021 (Management Science 67:720-741): in a CFO survey most firms' plans are insensitive to a 1 pp rate change
↓ The physical footprint of speedSpread Networks: 1,331 km trenched, $300M, round trip 16 ms → 13 ms; microwave beat it within 3 years at 4.1-4.7 msDescriptive (Laughlin et al. 2014; Lewis 2014)
↑ Physical oil-supply shock → volatility, inflation, rate hikes → recessionHamilton 1983 (JPE 91:228-248), 2003: 9 of 10 post-WWII US recessions were preceded by an oil-price spikeCONTESTED, Kilian 2009 (AER 99:1053-1069); Barsky & Kilian 2004; Bernanke, Gertler & Watson 1997: the oil price is largely endogenous/demand-driven and much of the downturn is the monetary-policy response. The mechanism is contested, not the "9/10" fact
↑ Chokepoint disruption → freight, insurance, commodity derivativesLloyd's List (March 2021); UNCTAD 2021, 2024: Ever Given 6 days, $9.6 bn/day of trade; Red Sea 2024 freight 3-4×, war-risk premium 0.05% → 0.5-1%Descriptive
↑ Crop failure → agricultural-futures spike2010 Russian grain-export ban → CBOT wheat +70%; 2012 US drought → corn record $8.30/bu (+60%)Descriptive (FAO, USDA)
↑ Long-run physical limits → asset returnsEROI decline 30:1 → 15-18:1; proposed societal EROI floor 5:1-11:1 (Hall & Klitgaard; Murphy 2014)CONTESTED, Nordhaus 1992 (BPEA); Krautkraemer 1998 (JEL 36:2065-2107): no long-run upward trend in real commodity prices; substitution and technical change offset consumption
The olcum fields are not one consistent series

Each channel is a set of point estimates from different studies, periods and definitions; not for comparing or summing, but to show that the coupling exists. The point values are central estimates.

Four channels are contested in the peer-reviewed literature

The commodity-speculation → price, rates → investment, oil-shock → recession (mechanism), and physical-limits → returns rows are contested; each is shown on the page with its counter-view and counter-source. The other four channels (crisis → output loss, the footprint of speed, chokepoint disruption, crop failure → futures) are descriptive and uncontested.

11Perspective page, Horizontal Cross-Section (cross-layer matrix)

The Horizontal Cross-Section page (/buyuk-resim/yatay-kesit) places the four layers side by side across six dimensions: workforce, land footprint, energy, time scale, fragility, ontological status. A separate cross-layer dataset (layer_horizontal_matrix.json). The workforce and latency rows reuse existing sourced datasets (layer_workforce.json, layer3_latency.json); land and energy are compiled from primary sources. Each cell is marked “measured / estimate / qualitative”.

Cross-section dimensions, sources
DimensionMain source(s)Type / limit
Workforce (people + employment share)layer_workforce.json · ILO modelled estimates, ILOSTAT 2024, ISIC Rev.4, 2023; SIFMA 2024 + US BLS NAICS 523/525 for L3L0/L1 measured; the L2 real-estate component and L3 core are estimates (band 15-35 M / 3-7 M)
Land footprint (million km²)FAO Land statistics 2001-2023 (FAOSTAT Analytical Brief 107, 2021); Maus et al. 2022 (Scientific Data 9:433); Gong et al. 2020 GAIA (RSE 236:111510)L0 and L2 measured; no sourced global total for L1 and L3 → qualitative
Energy (EJ/yr final energy)IEA World Energy Balances 2024; IEA Buildings / Data Centres; Aramendia et al. 2023 (GEC 83:102745); FAO 2011 Energy-Smart FoodAll four cells are allocation estimates, not measurements; rule in meta.enerji_paylastirma_kurali; world total 440 EJ (2022)
Time scale (seconds, order of magnitude)Dukes 2003 (Climatic Change 61:31-44); FAO crop calendars; Pistor 2019; Piketty 2014; layer3_latency.jsonL3 measured; L0/L1/L2 are order-of-magnitude anchors, not point values, read on a log axis
Fragility (shock type + example)Silva Rotta et al. 2020 (IJAEOG 90:102119); Lloyd's List / UNCTAD 2021; Laeven & Valencia 2018 (IMF WP 18/206); CFTC & SEC 2010Published figures of the example events, measured
Ontological status (conceptual anchor)Ayres & Kneese 1969 (AER 59:282-297); Georgescu-Roegen 1971; Szargut et al. 1988; Smil 2013; Pistor 2019; de Soto 2000; Carruthers & Stinchcombe 1999 (Theory and Society 28:353-382); MacKenzie 2006; Keynes 1936 ch. 12Conceptual, no numeric value
The dimensions are not one consistent series

The six dimensions are point estimates from different sources, periods and definitions; not for comparing or summing, but to let the four layers be seen horizontally in one frame. The sayisal field is comparable only within a dimension; for the time scale it is an order of magnitude in seconds.

Land/L1-L3 and energy are weak cells

There is no single sourced global total for industrial + logistics + rail land (only the 0.02 million km² rail corridor is derivable); nor a published global floor area for exchange colocation data centres, both are qualitative text cells. Energy in all four cells is an allocation of IEA sector data to the layer boundary; the L1 freight/passenger split (40% freight) is coarse and the L0 agriculture component leans on FAO 2011.

Full calculation trace: scripts/Automated_Layer3_Resources/build_layer3_market_flows.py

Four layers, one system: material is extracted, turns into value, accumulates, then moves again with no material stirring. The Big Picture →

← Layer 2 · WealthThe Big Picture →